An advocate in Juba says the establishment of a hybrid court is essential for effective justice and accountability.

Taban Romano says the court would bring justice to victims of violations and also strengthen the rule of law in the country.

Chapter V of the Agreement on the Resolution to end the Conflict in South Sudan (ARCSS) seeks the establishment of the hybrid court as part of transitional justice mechanisms to address violations committed during the conflict.

“The victims will also feel relieved when their voices are heard,” said Romano, adding that the aspect of justice and accountability is key for reconciliation and realizing sustainable peace. 

The hybrid court, characterized by a blend of international and national judicial mechanisms, will have jurisdiction with respect to the crimes of genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and other serious crimes committed under national and international law. 

It is to be established by the African Union Commission and have a majority of judges from African countries other than South Sudan. 

Advocate Taban Romano explains the importance of the court in this interview with David Lukan, who started by asking Mr. Romano why the court is important.